Jane Austen Heroines – Part 2

I hate to hear you talk about all women as if they were fine ladies instead of rational creatures. None of us want to be in calm waters all our lives.

Jane Austen, Persuasion

Emma Woodhouse

Emma (2009) dir. Jim O’Hanlon

I don’t know if it’s apocryphal, but Jane Austen is supposed to have said that Emma Woodhouse was a character “whom no one but myself will much like.” She was wrong, because Emma is beloved by readers everywhere. There are more adaptations of Emma than any other Austen novel except for Pride and Prejudice. (If you’re curious, Pride and Prejudice has a whopping twelve film adaptations; Emma has seven. Sense and Sensibility and Persuasion have had four each, Mansfield Park has had three, and poor Northanger Abbey has had only two.)

Emma Woodhouse is such a lovely character because, to use today’s parlance, she begins the novel completely unaware of her own privilege. Granted, she understands that she’s the wealthiest woman in the area and that other people don’t necessarily live as she does. However, the difference that her wealth and position make in her life, and the leeway that people give her because of it, is lost on her for quite a bit of the novel. But her experiences help her grow into a more empathetic, self-aware person. She learns that she’s not always right, that she needs to let her friends make their own decisions, and that she needs to be kinder to the people she considers beneath her.

I think Austen’s real triumph here is writing a character who is “handsome, clever, and rich” but who is also nuanced and likeable. Emma’s character very easily could have become the quintessential “mean girl,” but Austen gave her a heart of gold to balance her out. It’s brilliant character development, and I think Emma will remain a fan favorite for generations to come.

Marianne Dashwood

Sense and Sensibility (2008) dir. John Alexander

It’s really astounding to me how well Jane Austen was able to capture different types of personalities. While Marianne’s sister Elinor is stoic and practical, Marianne is nothing if not a flower child, skipping over the hills, reciting poetry, and falling in love at first sight. But, like Emma, Marianne has some growing up to do. She learns that love at first sight is not necessarily love that runs deep. She learns that chemistry doesn’t equal commitment. Most importantly, I think she learns the difference between love and romance. While Willoughby is romantic, he doesn’t love her enough to fight for her. To sacrifice for her. Marianne comes to see more value in Colonel Brandon’s quiet devotion than in all of Willoughby’s flowery words.

Marianne also comes to understand her sister better. I love that scene where she finds out that Edward Ferrars has been secretly engaged and she assumes that Elinor must not feel it very keenly because her grief isn’t demonstrative. The setting down that Marianne gets from Elinor is perfect, and it helps Marianne realize that there is more than one way to feel and show emotion. She comes to understand that still waters run deep. Basically, she learns the same thing about her sister that she does about Colonel Brandon. I think Marianne demonstrates the most growth of all of Austen’s characters.

Anne Elliot

Persuasion (2007) dir. Adrian Shergold

I would argue that Anne Elliot is the most damaged of Austen’s heroines. Like Fanny Price, she’s ignored and ridiculed by her family. But Anne’s also older, a faded beauty who fears that her chance at love has passed her by. Unlike Austen’s other leading ladies, Anne begins the book filled with regret. She allowed herself to be influenced by a family friend who convinced her to break off her engagement to Captain Wentworth, a man who she truly loved, because he wasn’t wealthy. When Captain Wentworth comes back into Anne’s sphere eight years later, Anne hopes to get a second chance with him.

It’s interesting that Persuasion is the last of Austen’s novels, written when Austen herself was almost forty. While her other novels feature women who must make difficult choices, Persuasion’s heroine starts the novel having made her choice many years ago. Anne isn’t the ingenue or the belle of the ball; she’s been all but put on the shelf and has little to do but reflect on her decisions. I think this makes her a compelling character and a welcome contrast to Austen’s previous characters. She’s the kind of character who you relate to more as you age. I love that Austen chose to write about a mature woman and that she chose to make that woman still desirable to the man who loves her. It’s such a testament to the power of true love.

Catherine Morland

Northanger Abbey (2008) dir. Jon Jones

Okay, I’ve got to fess up—I’m actually not the biggest fan of Catherine Morland. Some people find her naively charming. I find her stupid. But that said, she’s a realistic character. Who among us hasn’t allowed our imagination to run away with us? Who hasn’t put our faith in a false friend? I think of one the real reasons I don’t like Catherine is that I see some of the worst impulses of my youth reflected in her. I, like her, was pretty easily led for a while. I, like her, read a lot of books and it tended to color my understanding of the real world.

Catherine is interesting in that she’s very ordinary. Her family isn’t poor (like Fanny Price) or rich (like Emma Woodhouse). She’s neither very beautiful nor very plain. She’s not particularly witty. In many ways, Catherine is the everywoman of Austen’s heroines, and so her plight resonates with us.

That said, I still can’t read Northanger Abbey without rolling my eyes at almost everything Catherine does.

Happy Reading!

Jane Austen Heroines – Part 1

I do not think I ever opened a book in my life which had not something to say upon woman’s inconstancy. Songs and proverbs, all talk of woman’s fickleness. But perhaps you will say, these were all written by men.

Jane Austen, Persuasion

How to blog about books without talking in depth about one of the greatest English-language writers ever to have picked up a pen? Jane Austen’s books have the reputation for being sappy, silly love stories, but I would argue that anyone who thinks that has never read a Jane Austen novel. Do the heroines find love? Yes. Without exception. Do women the world over watch the movie adaptations of Austen’s novels and swoon? Absolutely. But Jane Austen’s work is not the Regency-era equivalent of a Walmart clearance rack romance (that is probably titled something like The Millionaire’s Secret Love Child). Her books are thoughtful, funny, biting social commentary. They portray people in all their shades: the Busybody, the Cad, the Hypochondriac, the Wallflower, the Wet Blanket. More to the point, she writes women in all their variety. There’s no formula to an Austen woman. No type.

Now, I’ve seen just about every book blog have some sort of ranking of Jane Austen heroines. I wanted to do something similar, because I could talk about Austen all. day. long. But how do you rank characters who are so different? What’s the criteria? How are they judged?

It seems to me that ranking Austen’s female characters does them a disservice. I feel that ranking them is basically just a popularity contest. Of course everyone likes Elizabeth Bennett and Emma Woodhouse the best; they’re the most gregarious and confident of the set, and those are attributes that our current society prizes.

So, instead of “ranking” Austen’s heroines, I’m going to (briefly) tell you why I love each one and why I think she’s a strong character. This is going to be another two-parter, so come back next week for my take on the ladies I don’t get to today.

Fanny Price

Mansfield Park (2007) dir. Iain B. MacDonald

That’s right. I’m starting with Fanny Price. Poor Fanny gets no love. I get it—Fanny’s kind of underwhelming. She’s got very little confidence, she’s a doormat for most of the book, she’s not super witty or clever (at least compared to some of Austen’s other characters), and she’s in love with her cousin (ew). But Fanny has some wonderful qualities that are often overlooked, especially by the other characters in Mansfield Park.

Fanny is described as useful. She is constantly there to read to or otherwise assist her Aunt Bertram and Aunt Norris, even though Aunt Norris is a hideously awful person. She knows that she’s not the most dazzling girl in the room; she’s not a Mary Crawford. She’s not wealthy, and we all know that wealth covers a multitude of Regency-era flaws. She’s not anything that is particularly valued by those around her, but she knows how to make herself useful. I think it’s beautiful that she carves a niche for herself in Mansfield Park, making the best of a challenging circumstance.

Fanny is an introvert. She doesn’t complain. She has a moral compass that leads her right every time. She stands her ground when the issue is important to her. Fanny Price deserves a lot more love than she sometimes gets from readers. If you’ve read Mansfield Park and you didn’t like her, I’d urge you to give her another chance. And if, by chance, you happen to be a movie director, would you please make an adaptation of Mansfield Park with a Fanny Price who is true to the actual book character? The movies are always trying to make Fanny wittier or sassier than she actually is. Fanny doesn’t need to be changed to be more palatable. Our society just needs to learn to appreciate different types of women.

Elinor Dashwood

Sense and Sensibility (2008) dir. John Alexander

Elinor Dashwood is, I think, another Austen lady who doesn’t get a ton of credit for being exceptional. Of her sisters, Elinor is the sensible, down-to-earth, no-nonsense one. While her family is dealing with the tragedy of her father’s passing and the reality that they’ll soon be forced from their home, Elinor is the one who keeps her head. Her mother keeps finding new houses that match their previous level of comfort, not their reduced financial circumstances. Her sisters Marianne and Margaret aren’t of much use. Elinor does the house hunting, the budgeting, arranges everything for their move. She does it all, and she does it with grace.

What I love about Elinor is that she never loses her cool, even when she would be within her rights to. Edward Ferrars leads her on and then disappoints her with zero explanation. Elinor then finds out that he’s been secretly engaged to some girl named Lucy Steele for a long time. Even as her heart breaks, Elinor is able to keep it together and hold her head up high.

If there’s one word, other than sensible or practical, that describes Elinor Dashwood, it’s dignified. She lives in a crummy cottage on a relative’s estate, she has to scrimp and save to get by, she faces the condescension of her obnoxious half-brother and sister-in-law, and she gets her heart broken. Through it all, Elinor never loses her dignity. I want to be like Elinor when I grow up.

Elizabeth Bennet

Pride and Prejudice (1995) dir. Simon Langton

Everyone loves Elizabeth Bennett. Well, maybe not everyone, but I haven’t met the person yet who doesn’t think this spunky heroine is the coolest. Wouldn’t you love to be friends with Elizabeth? I would. She’s exactly the kind of girl who is popular now. She’s witty, outgoing, smart, and kind of sarcastic. She’s a good friend and a loyal sister. She is aware of her family’s deficiencies but loves them fiercely anyway.

But the thing that I love best about Elizabeth is that she never sells herself short. Elizabeth Bennett knows her worth. She doesn’t accept Mr. Collins’ offer of marriage, even as she’s pressured to by her mother. She knows that he won’t make her happy, and she’s not willing to endure misery for the sake of comfort. Nor does she accept Mr. Darcy right away. He’s better than Mr. Collins (after all, who isn’t), but his marriage proposal is so insulting that Elizabeth’s previous dislike is only increased. She’s not impressed by his 10,000 pounds a year (which, according to this blog’s reckoning, is equal to almost $900,000). She won’t marry a man who insults her and her family just because he’s got money. It’s only after he earns her good opinion and her love that she agrees to marry him.

She also stands her ground and doesn’t allow herself to be cowed by people of higher status. One of my favorite scenes in this book is when Lady Catherine shows up at the Bennetts’ home unannounced and chews Elizabeth out for the sin of being the object of a rumor that Darcy wants to propose to her. She is, if it’s possible, more insulting than Mr. Darcy was in his first proposal.

Says Lady Catherine: “If you were sensible of your own good, you would not wish to quit the sphere in which you have been brought up.”

And then Elizabeth comes right back at her with this zinger: “In marrying your nephew, I should not consider myself as quitting that sphere. He is a gentleman; I am a gentleman’s daughter; so far we are equal.” Sure, the Bennetts don’t have as much money as Mr. Darcy, but Elizabeth doesn’t consider him to be so much above her. He is a gentleman. She is a gentleman’s daughter. In her eyes, she’s his equal. I love that.

One of the reasons I think Austen’s books are so popular with women is that we see ourselves reflected in these characters. While other authors write paper-thin archetypes or the omnipresent “strong female character” (gag), Jane Austen wrote women who breathe. What she wrote about the relationships between women, the way women think, the concerns of the women of that time, is so true to life, proving that Austen wasn’t just a good writer—she was a keen observer.

Next week, I’ll take a look at the rest of Jane Austen’s leading ladies: Emma Woodhouse, Catherine Morland, Anne Elliot, and Marianne Dashwood.

Happy Reading!

If You’re Bored, Take Up Beta Reading

If you have knowledge, let others light their candles in it.

Margaret Fuller

If you spend a lot of time around books, and if you have any friends who are authors, you might have heard the term beta reader before. A beta reader is a person, usually a volunteer, who reads an author’s work before it’s published to give an average reader’s opinion on the work. An author will often have several beta readers and will use their criticism to fine-tune their work. Often, the author will indicate exactly what they’d like the beta reader to look out for. Maybe they want the beta reader to flag any plot holes. Perhaps they’d like them to identify problems with character development, consistency, or the overall plot. Whatever it is, the beta reader is helpful because they approach the work with a fresh set of eyes and can spot issues that the author, who may be too close to the work to see it clearly, may have missed.

I’ve recently started making myself available as a beta reader, and so far I’ve loved it! I joined a Facebook group specifically for authors and beta readers. The authors post when they need beta readers and offer a brief description of their book; if it’s something I’m interested in, I reach out to the author and offer to read for them. I like this format because it doesn’t tie me down to anything. I’m not obligated to read for every author or every book. I can pick and choose which books appeal to me.

I’ve found that authors have different styles in the way they approach beta reading. Some authors send a file for the beta reader to make comments on individually, while others send one group file to all of their beta readers. In the second instance, I was able to see the comments of other people reading the book and elaborate on what they said, agree or disagree, etc. It had a fun, collaborative vibe that I really enjoyed.

One of the books I read is called The Christmas Foundling by Martha Keyes. It’s available for pre-order on Amazon now. I’d been sort of silently lurking on the Facebook group for a while, but nothing had piqued my interest—until this.

A babe in a manger once saved the world. Can this one save a failing marriage?

Lydia Blakeburn, Baroness Lynham, wants nothing more than to present her husband with an heir, but after five years of marriage, she has all but given up on doing so. What started as a love match has since begun to sour, yet there is nothing Lydia can do to free Miles from a marriage she is certain he regrets. The future they had envisioned together is slipping farther and farther away.


Miles Blakeburn is at his wit’s end. Not only has he failed to produce an heir to the family’s ancient title, his wife has withdrawn from him entirely. The one thing in the world she wants, he has thus far been unable to give her: a child. He is a failure in every regard.


When they happen upon an abandoned baby at the Frost Fair, Miles simply can’t resist the light he sees sparked in his wife’s eyes as she holds the child. He agrees to take the foundling in until Christmastide is over, when they will find the babe a permanent home. But, for a couple who’s been yearning for a baby for years, the infant can’t help but expose all the feelings Lydia and Miles have long been trying to bury, feelings that have the power to bring them back together—or estrange them forever.”

First of all, I have to admit that I’m a sucker for a Regency romance, but this one deals specifically with infertility, and that’s a subject in which I have enormous experience. I felt like particular little book calling to me, so I reached out to the author, and she graciously allowed me to read for her. Y’all, I’m not lying when I tell you that I wept. When it comes to showing how it feels to be struggling with infertility, Martha Keyes has absolutely hit the nail on the head. Reading this book left me feeling quite raw, but in the best of ways. I offered a few thoughts as a beta reader, but overall I just felt that this book was stunning.

After my experience reading The Christmas Foundling, I wasn’t actively seeking another thing to beta read. I had a lot on my plate and more coming down the pike, so I wasn’t under any illusions that I had a ton of free time to spend on beta reading.

But I happened upon a request for beta readers for Bronwyn, a fantasy retelling of Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park. Now, Mansfield Park doesn’t get a lot of love among bibliophiles, but it’s one of my favorite Austen novels, hands down. And then you add in a fantasy element? How could I pass this up?

Bronwyn didn’t end up hitting me in the gut the way The Christmas Foundling did, but it was a thoroughly enjoyable piece of escapist literature with well-defined characters and a (much-needed) twist on the original ending. The author had some truly lovely bits of prose, especially describing a Halloween festival that was just delightfully imaginative. She also worked fantasy elements seamlessly and believably into a Jane Austen world. I had a complete blast with this read, available for preorder here.

I think the thing that I’ve enjoyed most about beta reading is helping a good author make a good book better. Nobody and no book is perfect, but a beta reader can help an author tweak their book to make it the best it can be. As someone who reads a lot, I’ve often read books and wished I could have talked an author off a particular cliff, mentioned that a character seemed superfluous, or pointed out a major plot hole. Beta reading gives me the opportunity to use the knowledge and insight I’ve gained as a reader to help authors put forward their best work. Plus, it’s really fun! If you’re looking for something to occupy some time during this endless pandemic, consider joining a group of beta readers. It could help you discover some literary gems.

Happy Reading!